Scientific Evidence for Whale and Dolphin Rights

The evidence that whales and dolphins deserve to have their rights recognsied is growing by the week and WDC’s rights position is entirely underpinned by evolving and sound science. So what is the thought process that has taken us from an organisation focussed on protecting species and populations, to one that also focuses equally on protecting the welfare and rights of each and every individual whale and dolphin? Here we provide details of just some of the supporting scientific evidence.

Whales and Dolphins: complex behaviours from complex species

Whales and dolphins exhibit a wide range of fascinating behaviours, from hunting, spy-hoping and tail slapping, to surfing waves and using tools. There are also well substantiated reports of whales and dolphins rescuing humans and even trying to commit suicide in captivity.

Whale and dolphin species tend to exhibit a high degree of social behaviour, including cooperative behaviour, which helps to ensure that groups are successful. Examples of cooperation include bubble-net feeding in humpback whales and the co-operative behaviour between bottlenose dolphins and fishermen reported in various parts of the world.

For a comprehensive review of whale and dolphin behaviour see ‘Into the Brains of Whales’ by Mark Simmonds.

Brain structure and intelligence

So what secrets about whale and dolphin behaviour and intelligence can be gleaned from investigating the large brains of our mammalian cousins?

In recent years, the study of whale and dolphin brains has provided some amazing insights into how these complex beings have evolved and the processing skills for which their brains have adapted.

Whale and dolphin brains are big. Sperms whales have the largest brain on the planet, weighing around 7.8kg. The average bottlenose dolphin brain weighs around 1,700g, whereas the average adult human brain weighs around 1,300g. Does brain size tell us that these species are smarter than us? Well, not necessarily.

Scientists use a ratio of relative brain to body mass, known as Encephalisation Quotient (or EQ). However, EQ is not considered an appropriate measure of intelligence in great whales, due in part to the fact that a high proportion of a whale’s mass is blubber and that many whale species are disproportionately large, an adaptation to the ecological niches that they inhabit. For more information on the origin and evolution of large brains in toothed whales see Marino et al. 2004.

In the quest to unravel the intelligence of other species, just as important as absolute brain size is brain structure. As a result of the fact that dolphins have evolved in, and adapted to, an aquatic environment there are some striking difference between dolphin and human brain structure. Dr Lori Marino, a leading researcher in whale and dolphin brain anatomy, notes that the brains of these species have evolved ‘along a different neuroanatomical trajectory’ to human brains, but provide ‘an example of an alternative evolutionary route to complex intelligence on earth’.

Marino further notes: ‘In particular, the cetacean cerebral cortex (the part of the brain involved in higher-order cognition) evolved along a very different trajectory than other mammals, resulting in a highly unusual arrangement of functional areas and an entirely unique structure, the paralimbic lobe. Yet, despite the vast differences in cortical organization cetaceans and humans (as well as great apes) share a number of complex cognitive abilities, such as self-recognition.  Cetaceans and humans, therefore, are a striking example of evolutionary convergence in psychology among mammals.   These similarities, importantly, mean that cetaceans, as humans, are vulnerable to emotional and social stresses that can lead to considerable harm.  This important point is critical to guiding the ethics of how we interact with and treat cetaceans’.

See ‘Brain Structure and Intelligence in Cetacean’ by Lori Marino in Whales and Dolphin: cognition, culture, conservation and human perceptions.

One very important piece of evidence which emerged in recent years is the existence in some whale and dolphin species of special brain cells known as spindle cells or Von Economo neurones.

Spindle cells are thought to be responsible for ‘rapid intuitive choice in complex social situations’ and are associated with emotions such as empathy. Until relatively recently it was believed that these special brain cells were only found in the brains of humans and some primates. Research now shows that spindle cells are present in the brains of the following whale and dolphin species:

Humpback whales

Fin whales

Sperm whales

Orcas

Belugas

Bottlenose dolphins and

Risso’s dolphins

Scientists have also discovered the presence of spindle cells in the brains of African and Asian elephants, also known for their complex social behaviours and it may be that these tiny brain cells become an important feature for defining socially and emotionally complex and intelligent species.

The existence of spindle cells, coupled with the revelation that bottlenose dolphins have a sense of self, as shown by the use of a mirror to investigate their own bodies, provides compelling evidence that these are intelligent, sentient and sapient species.

Overall, as Marino et al. 2007 note: ‘cetaceans continue to provide an enormous body of empirical evidence for complex behavior, learning, sociality, and culture’.

Marino even speculates that: ‘It may be that many cetacean species have achieved a level of social-emotional sophistication not achieved by other animals, including humans’.

Consciousness

The study of brain structure inevitably leads to questions about consciousness. Consciousness is an essential element for experiencing and potentially understanding the world around you and comprehending how you fit in. Finally, a group of eminent scientists have who have dedicated themselves to the biological questions associated with consciousness have finally agreed that we humans are not alone. Not surprisingly, they argue that the abundance of new data in this field requires a re-evaluation of our preconceptions about consciousness in other species and they state that:

'Convergent evidence indicates that non-human animals have the neuroanatomical, neurochemical, and neurophysiological substrates of conscious states along with the capacity to exhibit intentional behaviours. Consequently, the weight of evidence indicates that humans are not unique in possessing the neurological substrates that generate consciousness. Nonhuman animals, including all mammals and birds, and many other creatures, including octopuses, also possess these neurological substrates.'

The Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness was crafted in July 2012 at Cambridge University during the Francis Crick Memorial Conference on Consciousness in Human and non-Human Animals. The Declaration was signed by the conference participants and in the presence of the celebrated scientist, Professor Stephen Hawking.

The evidence suggests that whales and dolphins are not only conscious, and that bottlenose dolphins, at least, are self-awareness, but also that they have complex brain structure for complex function, that they often live in complex societies, that they are capable of experiencing a range of emotions.

Emotion in the Ocean

There are many reports of whales and dolphins exhibiting a variety of behaviours that can be associated with certain emotions. Of course, much of this material is based on inference, since it is very difficult for us to know definitively how a whale or dolphin ‘feels’ about a certain situation. Nevertheless, such reports are compelling and require closer examination. Darwin himself argued that the difference between species is a difference in ‘kind’, rather than ‘type’ and the concept of evolutionary continuity provides a strong basis for the existence of emotions in species other than our own.

Cognitive ethologists often describe behaviours which they believe to be associated with, for example, aggression or play. Such behaviours often involve the exhibition of physical activities that can be measured and evaluated. More difficult to quantify are some of the more complex behaviours associated with emotions, such as grief, or maternal love.

Nevertheless, some scientists have described the exhibition of specific emotions, such as grief, in some whale and dolphin species. When researchers have spent a lifetime studying a particular species, getting to understand and recognise a range of different behaviours and their context, reports of specific behaviours being associated with certain emotions have considerable credibility and deserve our attention.

A good example of this is a report presented by experienced orca research Dr Naomi Rose, who provides an interesting account of an event in 1990 when two young male orcas exhibited what she interprets as grief, following the death of their mother. The young males were observed repeatedly visiting the locations that their mother had visited in the last few days of her life. This account can be read in The Smile of a Dolphin: remarkable accounts of animal emotions (Edited by Marc Bekoff). Such reports, whilst anecdotal, provide important insights that can be used as the basis for empirical studies of emotion.

As we know, empathy is another very important emotion for social species, particularly because it is associated with anticipating the reaction of others. The discovery of spindle cells in the brains of some whale and dolphin species provides good supporting evidence that these species may be capable of experiencing complex emotions such as empathy and indeed that this emotion may provide an important evolutionary advantage for these highly social species.

Communication

It has been argued, quite plausibly, that if a species can communicate in sophisticated and novel ways then this implies a certain degree of intelligence. Whales and dolphins communicate in many ways with each other, from the body language of posturing, to the high pitched ‘signature whistles’ of bottlenose dolphins. It has even been suggested that bubble-streams may even play a role in communication. Perhaps one of the best studied forms of communication in whales is the extraordinary and haunting song of the humpback whale, first described by Roger Payne and Scott McVay in 1971.

The song of male humpback whales is one of the most complex non-human communications ever studied.  Its exact biological role remains something of a mystery, but it is believed to be associated with reproduction (either competition between males, or perhaps in relation to mate selection). Remarkably, there is also strong evidence that these amazing songs are transmitted culturally (see Culture section below and Noad et al. 2000).

A variety of communication techniques in bottlenose dolphins, orcas and sperm whales have also been studied extensively. A range of different acoustic communications have been discovered from greeting and alarm calls to the rhythmic sets of clicks emitted by sperm whales in what are termed ‘codas’.

One of the most well-known studies of dolphin communication was conducted in 1986 by Louis Herman (in Dolphin Cognition and Behaviour: a comparative approach (Comparative Cognition and Neuroscience Series). During this research, captive bottlenose dolphins were taught a basic sign language and a computer-generated language consisting of various sounds. What was remarkable about this study was that it demonstrated that as well as understanding simple sentences and new or unusual combinations of words, the dolphins actually showed understanding of syntax (or sentence structure), an advanced linguistic concept.

This discovery is all the more remarkable when one considers that we humans have spent decades trying to unravel the possible languages of other species, and yet the dolphins were able to understand the syntax of a human generated language.

Adding further to the complexity of dolphin communication is the theory that ‘it is possible for an eavesdropping dolphin to discern object information from the returning echoes generated by the echolocation signals of other conspecifics’. The jury is still out on how, or if, eavesdropping is an important part of social life for dolphins. However, this potentially presents yet another fascinating way in which dolphins may be interacting.

Tool use

The use of tools by other species indicates the ability to physically manipulate the world in order to get something an individual wants or needs, or perhaps even just for fun (as for example with the bubble rings produced by bottlenose dolphins). Tool use has long been seen as a marker of intelligence, but can also be associated with social learning and culture. There are examples of tool use in several species other than primates. In two quite separate regions of the world, bottlenose dolphins exhibit two excellent examples of tool use for foraging.

In Shark Bay, Western Australia, female Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins have regularly been observed carrying sponges on their jaws. The sponges are collected and then used to protect them whilst they forage for food in the sediment and in crevices on the sea floor. This activity is known as ‘sponging’.

Another great example of manipulating the world is provided by bottlenose dolphins along the coast of Florida who use mud to create a trap for fish. The BBC has some great footage of this remarkable hunting method.

But perhaps one of the best known and most spectacular examples of manipulation of the environment is exhibited during the cooperative foraging strategy used by humpback whales, which results in a bubble nets that encircles large schools of fish. This complex behaviour requires cooperation, anticipation of the action of others, social learning, understanding acoustic cues and probably a good deal of patience whilst the technique is learnt and perfected.

Culture

The two leading experts in the field of culture in whale and dolphin societies, Hal Whitehead and Luke Rendell, define culture asinformation or behaviour - shared by a population or subpopulation - which is acquired from conspecifics through some form of social learning’. In this case ‘sub-population’ is used to describe a social group of individuals, rather than necessarily a genetically or geographically distinct group. Examples of cultural transmission include humpback whale song, which is ‘transmitted’ between groups of males, between geographic locations and even between seasons, in a manner similar to the way in which a ‘pop song’ catches on in our own cultures. Other examples of cultural transmission or social learning, include the radically different foraging techniques seen in some groups of orcas and even the use of sponges as tools exhibited by some bottlenose dolphins, as discussed earlier.

Why is culture an important part of the rights debate? The existence of unique cultures within some populations of whales and dolphins demonstrates not only that these are intelligent beings who are able to transmit information to each other, both between and within generations, but it also shows that there are important rules of conduce within cultural groups. These sophisticated societies cannot simply be evaluated on a numeric biological basis, which seeks to understand simply whether populations are approaching carrying capacity, or recovering from previous exploitation. Acknowledging that species other than our own have complex cultural structures requires us to look more closely at these populations and the way that we protect them, as species and populations, but also as cultural units and individuals.

 

This is just some of the evidence that WDC believes makes whales and dolphins special and deserving of the recognition of their individual rights. If you agree, then please sign the Declaration of Rights for Cetaceans: whales and dolphins. For further information on the scientific evidence which supports this campaign and the cultural attitudes to whales and dolphins around the world see Whales and Dolphins: cognition, culture, conservation and human perceptions.